<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Thinking Clearly - Latest Comments in XACML Policy Management (XPM): An Overture</title><link>http://clarkparsia.disqus.com/</link><description>Semantics: OWL, RDF, etc.</description><atom:link href="https://clarkparsia.disqus.com/xacml_policy_management_xpm_an_overture/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:45:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: XACML Policy Management (XPM): An Overture</title><link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/10/16/xacml-policy-management-xpm-an-overture/#comment-3738671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've thought for a long time that XACML's notion of role based access control makes it great for addressing the digital rights management needs of the publishing industry. (I mean "digital rights *management*" quite literally, as opposed to "digital rights enforcement," which is what most people mean when they discuss DRM.) As you said, though, it's "rather complex and opaque"; I brought Hal Lockhardt to a PRISM meeting several years ago and the PRISM group thought it was interesting but had a difficult time understanding the value it could bring to their standard. There's a bit more on related issues at &lt;a href="http://www.snee.com/bobdc.blog/2008/02/managing_digital_rights_in_the.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.snee.com/bobdc.blog/2008/02/managing_digital_rights_in_the.html"&gt;http://www.snee.com/bobdc.b...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob DuCharme</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:45:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>