http://clarkparsia.disqus.com/Semantics: OWL, RDF, etc.enTue, 20 Mar 2007 13:45:09 -0000http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/03/19/why-not-sparql-for-dblp/#comment-1446952I hope it was a good surprise!<br><br>I'd be interested in what you come up with.Bijan ParsiaTue, 20 Mar 2007 13:45:09 -0000http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/03/19/why-not-sparql-for-dblp/#comment-1446951Hi,<br><br>I was really surprised to see my comment again...<br>The answer is really interesting. In fact, it's true I was looking for some kind of tech show. I discovered this RDF DBLP two days before on the W3C SWEO wiki, and I was looking for a way to integrate it in Exhibit... so when I saw your post, my first though was "same data, same result but the middle is different..." Maybe my comment was kind of a "lazy web" one to see if you would do the job ;)<br>But I must agree plain DBLP is much easier to use right now. On the other side, more interesting than RDF DBLP is SwetoDBLP <a href="http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/semdis/swetodblp/" rel="nofollow">http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/semdis/swetodblp/</a> but it's only available as a dump and I wouldn't deal with a triple store just for that...<br>Also, this Exhibit/sparql looks really interresting, I might give it a try....florentTue, 20 Mar 2007 05:43:45 -0000