DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Thinking Clearly is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

  • Subscribe

  • Community

  • Top Commenters

  • Popular Threads

  • Recent Comments

    • Small update: the rate that housing in DC is going for Obama's upcoming inauguration, I think we can massively capitalize C&P by renting out the office for the week! I've seen rates...

      7 months ago by Kendall

      in Yes We Can? Yes We Did!

    • I appreciate how difficult that must have been for you, Jim, and I agree that "woohoo" is exactly how I felt too! :>

      7 months ago by Kendall

      in Yes We Can? Yes We Did!

    • Testing Disqus, again... Hopefully it works out this time.

      7 months ago by Kendall

      in Pellet 2.0 RC3

    • As much as I hate to agree with Kendall, I must say WOOOOHOOO!!!

      8 months ago by Jim Hendler

      in Yes We Can? Yes We Did!

    • It's utterly joyous and amazing. The bummer in the joy are the various anti-gay marriage initiatives, including the loathsome Prop 8 in California. I find it hard to believe and sad that people...

      8 months ago by Bijan Parsia

      in Yes We Can? Yes We Did!

Thinking Clearly

Semantics: OWL, RDF, etc.
Jump to original thread »
Author

Why not SPARQL (for DBLP)?

Started by Kendall · 10 months ago

Hoisted from the comments:
Hi,
Instead of using XSLT, you could also use directly the RDF access to DBLP : http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/dblp/
Normally a Sparql query can give you all the needed data.
Did you try this way ?
I did not so try. After poking a bit I ... Continue reading »

2 comments

  • florent

    2 years ago

    Hi,

    I was really surprised to see my comment again...
    The answer is really interesting. In fact, it's true I was looking for some kind of tech show. I discovered this RDF DBLP two days before on the W3C SWEO wiki, and I was looking for a way to integrate it in Exhibit... so when I saw your post, my first though was "same data, same result but the middle is different..." Maybe my comment was kind of a "lazy web" one to see if you would do the job ;)
    But I must agree plain DBLP is much easier to use right now. On the other side, more interesting than RDF DBLP is SwetoDBLP http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/semdis/swetodblp/ but it's only available as a dump and I wouldn't deal with a triple store just for that...
    Also, this Exhibit/sparql looks really interresting, I might give it a try....
    reply
  • Bijan Parsia

    2 years ago

    I hope it was a good surprise!

    I'd be interested in what you come up with.
    reply
Please login to comment.
Returning? Login