-
Website
http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/ -
Original page
http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2007/03/19/why-not-sparql-for-dblp/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
11 comments · 4 points
-
Dave Beckett
1 comment · 2 points
-
Kendall
23 comments · 1 points
-
drewpca
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
I was really surprised to see my comment again...
The answer is really interesting. In fact, it's true I was looking for some kind of tech show. I discovered this RDF DBLP two days before on the W3C SWEO wiki, and I was looking for a way to integrate it in Exhibit... so when I saw your post, my first though was "same data, same result but the middle is different..." Maybe my comment was kind of a "lazy web" one to see if you would do the job ;)
But I must agree plain DBLP is much easier to use right now. On the other side, more interesting than RDF DBLP is SwetoDBLP http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/semdis/swetodblp/ but it's only available as a dump and I wouldn't deal with a triple store just for that...
Also, this Exhibit/sparql looks really interresting, I might give it a try....
I'd be interested in what you come up with.