<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Thinking Clearly - Latest Comments in Owlgres: A Scalable OWL Reasoner</title><link>http://clarkparsia.disqus.com/</link><description>Semantics: OWL, RDF, etc.</description><atom:link href="https://clarkparsia.disqus.com/owlgres_a_scalable_owl_reasoner/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:50:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Owlgres: A Scalable OWL Reasoner</title><link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-3738661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Markus,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm PostgreSQL developer  and would like to work on effective&lt;br&gt;RDF storage in PostgreSQL in the framework of our astronomical&lt;br&gt;project "Astronet" (&lt;a href="http://www.astronet.ru" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.astronet.ru"&gt;www.astronet.ru&lt;/a&gt;). We developed and maintain&lt;br&gt;GiST and GIN indexing framework as well as text search and other&lt;br&gt;PostgreSQL extensions. I'm not an expert in ontology technologies&lt;br&gt;yet and have no practical experience. If you have any specific postgreSQL problems or ideas how to improve performance of semantic queries,  don't hesitate to communicate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;    Oleg&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oleg Bartunov</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:50:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Owlgres: A Scalable OWL Reasoner</title><link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-1447059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Olivier,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't speak for the other projects, but Owlgres isn't Postgres-specific or even tied to Postgres. We developed it with Postgres in mind, but we don't any Postgres internals tweaking. Owlgres exists purely at the JDBC level, except for database-specific setup code.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So we could easily make Owlgres work for Oracle or DB2, and probably will do so at some point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To get the *most* performance, one might tweak some DB internals (which is one reason we *prefer* Postgres), but so far that's not been necessary.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:51:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Owlgres: A Scalable OWL Reasoner</title><link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-1447058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IBM is working on a DLP (and now DL) engine on top of DB2.&lt;br&gt;there is an attempt from the EPFL to add such support to Oracle. OwlGres is targetted at Postgres.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Definitely there is something to investigate, it seems :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From a developper point of view, I have a concern.&lt;br&gt;Is it possible to abstract such a technology from the RDBMS?&lt;br&gt;So we are not tied to a given "vendor".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or does it require fine tuning of the database internals?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lolive</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Owlgres: A Scalable OWL Reasoner</title><link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-1447057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There will be a first public release soonish; we'll be giving demos at OWLED next week, and I think some Ordnance Survey folks will be there. After that, we'll make a public release.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Owlgres: A Scalable OWL Reasoner</title><link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-1447056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a demo version we can download and experiment with?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JohnGoodwin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Owlgres: A Scalable OWL Reasoner</title><link>http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2008/03/23/owlgres-scalable-db/#comment-1447055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Readers should note that LUBM, as generally used, is not expressible in DL-Lite because it uses transitive properties and because qualified existentials are used in the left side of subsumption relations.  The results presented here are with a modified version that reduces the expressivity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>