-
Website
http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/ -
Original page
http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2005/12/23/merry-war-on-xmas/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
11 comments · 4 points
-
Dave Beckett
1 comment · 2 points
-
Kendall
23 comments · 1 points
-
drewpca
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
For all x, if x is such that celebrates(greetee, x), then may happyFor(x, greetee) hold.
Which means the thing ('holiday') you're quantifying over is relative to the greetee, rather than some agreed upon domain of holidays (since that's clearly contentious--even if only by idiots--Oreilly: 'What?? Kwanza is not a holiday!'). Plus, there's a prevailing assumption that you only celebrate one holiday, so it seems plausible to make the happyness of the holiday relative to the person being greeted too.
What's neat is that the truth value of the consequent, happyFor(x, greetee), is completely dependent upon the person being greeted; you're only *wishing* for it to be true :)
(Assume bijan and you are logical constants...replace with the appropriate parties)
I suspect the start date is a bit flexible (e.g., Dec 12 is prolly fine, may even be better). To make this into Happy Holidays, you need to kill he greetingFor, then muck with the wishes operator...which really isn't a predicate, but a propositional attitude. So we have an intensional structure no matter what.
So, to update the updated one:
Or to get more in touch with my inner me:
Add your own codicil (e.g., notInvolvingAnimalSacrafice(x), etc.)