DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Thinking Clearly is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

  • Subscribe

  • Community

  • Top Commenters

  • Popular Threads

  • Recent Comments

    • Small update: the rate that housing in DC is going for Obama's upcoming inauguration, I think we can massively capitalize C&P by renting out the office for the week! I've seen rates...

      7 months ago by Kendall

      in Yes We Can? Yes We Did!

    • I appreciate how difficult that must have been for you, Jim, and I agree that "woohoo" is exactly how I felt too! :>

      7 months ago by Kendall

      in Yes We Can? Yes We Did!

    • Testing Disqus, again... Hopefully it works out this time.

      7 months ago by Kendall

      in Pellet 2.0 RC3

    • As much as I hate to agree with Kendall, I must say WOOOOHOOO!!!

      8 months ago by Jim Hendler

      in Yes We Can? Yes We Did!

    • It's utterly joyous and amazing. The bummer in the joy are the various anti-gay marriage initiatives, including the loathsome Prop 8 in California. I find it hard to believe and sad that people...

      8 months ago by Bijan Parsia

      in Yes We Can? Yes We Did!

Thinking Clearly

Semantics: OWL, RDF, etc.
Jump to original thread »
Author

Integrity Constraints in Pellet

Started by Kendall · 11 months ago

As people discover from time to time, OWL isn’t really a schema language; because of its semantics (open world assumption, etc), instance data that looks different from schema data doesn’t lead to the reasoner declaring a constraint violation. Rather, it may lead to the inference of new knowledge.

This is neither a good nor bad ... Continue reading »

0 comments

This thread has no comments yet.

Please login to comment.
Returning? Login